The Brutality of Reason Example

By Ironcross One-One

Slicing and dicing things into pieces small enough
to be fed to Liberals, Kooks and Anti-Americans.
When feeding Kooks and Anti-Americans
I suggest a potato gun.

If you are the emotional liberal type, this mindspace will make you uncomfortable. If you think my logic or facts are faulty, lets discuss it. When your findings disagree with my findings, that is dialogue. But using rhetoric to disagree with science is demogoguery. No demogoguery! I usually refrain from insults, but occasionally, ignorance and liberal hypocrisy bring out the worst in me.

Location: Edge of Nowhere, Washington, United States

Military Jumper, Diver, Motorcycle Rider, Air Traffic Control and Demolitions Man. I build furniture and cabinets and can frame, roof, wire, plumb and finish a house. Can weld steel, drive heavy equipment, build pole barns and mortared rock walls. Have written one bad novel and one brilliant thesis. And I play the guitar.

Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Victimhood, Victimism, Victimist and Victimology

Victim - The sufferer of a negative effect, event or burden.
Victimize - To turn a non-victim into a victim.
Victimhood - The status of being a victim
Victimism - A life strategy built around victimhood as a means of obtaining resources or support.
Victimist - A practicing student of victimism or a professional victim.
Victimology - The science of trying to avoid being made into a victim by Victims.

During the Watergate Scandal, the source known as DEEP THROAT advised Post reporters Woodbird and Brimstone to "follow the money". If you want to find the professional victims, do the same thing. Look for places where money finds its way into the hands of people that make no contribution to production or society.

There is someone who thinks they have a claim to what you produce just because they breathe. But in my mind, the minute they do that, they've just victimized you.
Also included is those sorry whiners that complain about every little cloud that forms and never have a positive suggestion or inspiring moment. They suck life out of the atmosphere like a mine explosion. They leech off your emotional capital. They are fueled by your stability, drive and capability.

I am a professional Victimologist. I take deliberate steps to avoid victimhood, I especially avoid being a victim of the victimists.

I recommend you keep away from victimists. They are like vampires, which also starts with a "V". However, vampires usually dress better, are not a threat during the day (this keeps them off of traffic islands with handmade signs that say "will work for blood"), can be easily identified with a mirror, can be kept away with a little garlic and a cross, and once identified, are legal to kill with a wooden stake through the heart. Victims are like vampires in one other way. They seem to live forever.

Victimists are protected and subsidized and have a huge PR department called the liberal left. Nothing is their fault, they just didn't win the lottery of life.

Here's a question - if it was legal to hunt victimists, how many would there be?


There will be more on this sometime - I promise.


Blogger Nerissa said...

People who focus on being victims are in the same boat as the paranoid person who actually is being followed by a dangerous stalker.

We wouldn't try to treat such a paranoid person by giving them money. Instead we'd pass laws and pay for the necessary police force to eliminate the stalkers.

Conservatives would tell the paranoid person to pretend they don't have a reason for their concern. Liberals would like to pay them for being forced to deal with stalkers.

A better solution is for everyone to get on board with treating people fairly. In order to do this I suggest we put two things off limits. The conservatives can't use their religion to justify harming others. And the liberals can't use past wrongs, since corrected, to justify reparations like preferential admission to colleges.


6:15 AM  
Blogger ironcross11 said...

So what harm do conservatives do in the name of religion?

Do you mean Evangelical Christians Hasidic Jews or Wahibist Muslims?

Lets talk about the harm that atheists and agnostic humanists do. They saturate our society in filth and poison our environment. The victims of the humanists are twisted into human wrecks addicted to porn, violence, narcotics, alcohol, gambling and even sexual abuse of children.

They claim a right to avoid all exposure to religion but refuse a reciprocal right to control the public broadcast of their poisons.

10:01 PM  
Blogger Nerissa said...

The evidence does not supports your contention that humanists are the root of all evil. In fact, if recent incidents reported in the media are typical the "good" Christians account for a disproportionately high percentage of child abuse and sexual improprieties. As for violence, I've yet to see humanists bomb innocent civilians in foreign countries as the Christian Right wingers enjoy doing. Killing people is not OK just because they aren't Christian although I realize that is not what the church teaches so forgive me if this is a difficult concept for you.

2:37 AM  
Blogger ironcross11 said...

Your bland, homogeneous baseless accusations that Christians are bombing foriegners are pedantic and sophomoric. The Military, acting under lawful orders of the Commander- in-Chief and duly authorized by congressional resulution in october 2001 (Afghanistan) and October 2002 (Iraq) are conducting the most surgically accurate bombing in the history of the world. There are muslims, pagans, taoists, athiests and agnostics flying those planes.
Iraqi commanders are selecting targets for US Airpower Controllers to deliver strikes on.

Your Democrat leaders are lying to you when they tell you that the war is illegal. The funding is authorized by Congress just as dictated by the Constitution. The UN does not get to decide what actions of the US are illegal. If this war is illegal, then Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are war criminals. All funding originates in Congress.

As for your accusations about child abuse and sexual improprieties, anecdotal oddities do not constitute science. Homes without faith are far more likely to expose children to porn, crime, drug and alcohol use and other risky behaviors. Children from such homes are far more likely to be the victims or perpetrators of crime. To assert otherwise is vacuous.

Further, humanist organizations (like NAMBLA) push the agenda that all sex with children is OK because there is no morality. No Christian organizations are pushing sex with children. 10000 violent crimes a year go unreported by the media. But the 10 committed by a twisted person with a religious background get deep coverage. Why?- because they are statistically very rare.

Pardon me for schooling you in the obvious, but here's the reality of the political philosophy.

If there is no God, there is no morality. If there is no morality, then there is no right, no wrong and no rule of law. There are not enough cops and lawyers in the world to enforce order on an amoral culture.

If the people are the source of government and the people reject the concept of right or wrong, then individuals have no rights. Because right and wrong are the underpinnings of rights.

But the fundamental premise of our government is that our rights are endowed by the creator. The purpose of our constitution is to limit the powers of government.

3:25 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Copyright © 2005 Michael A. Breeden