The Brutality of Reason Example

By Ironcross One-One

Slicing and dicing things into pieces small enough
to be fed to Liberals, Kooks and Anti-Americans.
When feeding Kooks and Anti-Americans
I suggest a potato gun.

If you are the emotional liberal type, this mindspace will make you uncomfortable. If you think my logic or facts are faulty, lets discuss it. When your findings disagree with my findings, that is dialogue. But using rhetoric to disagree with science is demogoguery. No demogoguery! I usually refrain from insults, but occasionally, ignorance and liberal hypocrisy bring out the worst in me.

Location: Edge of Nowhere, Washington, United States

Military Jumper, Diver, Motorcycle Rider, Air Traffic Control and Demolitions Man. I build furniture and cabinets and can frame, roof, wire, plumb and finish a house. Can weld steel, drive heavy equipment, build pole barns and mortared rock walls. Have written one bad novel and one brilliant thesis. And I play the guitar.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

No Terror = Wussie President

There will be no terror attacks in the next 2 years. At least, none that Al Qaeda will organize and take credit for. They know it won't be tolerated. They know that the only chance they have of getting a wussie leftist President is to lie low. If they were to pull off something spectacular, they know the heartland will coalesce around the President and America would elect a stony man with fire-breathing rhetoric and a full willingness to draw and use our bloody sword of war.

They'd like to see Madrassa-schooled Barack (small-balls-big-ears) Obama or the lifetime leftist Hillary (no-balls-big-ass) Clinton.

From a geopolitical strategy, it would be hard to complain about Obama if he were a Pro-Democracy, Pro-American Muslim. It would be hard for Muslim radicals to rally people against the pro-democracy foreign policy of a Muslim President. The idea that the march of democracy was inherently anti-Islamic would become hard to sell.

What would become incredibly more complicated would be the Isreali-Arab conflict. But that thing is going to continue to be a problem until someone tells the Arabs "NO" in language so firm that they actually believe it. It just might be a Muslim President that could do that. The question becomes... would he? Does he have the stones to stand for tolerance of all religions? I doubt it.

I doubt he has the stones to even significantly acknowledge his Muslim ties. You can tell him I said that.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Copyright © 2005 Michael A. Breeden