The Brutality of Reason Example

By Ironcross One-One

Slicing and dicing things into pieces small enough
to be fed to Liberals, Kooks and Anti-Americans.
When feeding Kooks and Anti-Americans
I suggest a potato gun.

If you are the emotional liberal type, this mindspace will make you uncomfortable. If you think my logic or facts are faulty, lets discuss it. When your findings disagree with my findings, that is dialogue. But using rhetoric to disagree with science is demogoguery. No demogoguery! I usually refrain from insults, but occasionally, ignorance and liberal hypocrisy bring out the worst in me.

Location: Edge of Nowhere, Washington, United States

Military Jumper, Diver, Motorcycle Rider, Air Traffic Control and Demolitions Man. I build furniture and cabinets and can frame, roof, wire, plumb and finish a house. Can weld steel, drive heavy equipment, build pole barns and mortared rock walls. Have written one bad novel and one brilliant thesis. And I play the guitar.

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Hypocrite Alert

The civil liberties advocates over at World Can't Wait dot Org didn't allow my post. Here's the way I see it. If my point of view was ignorant and inane, they'd post it. They wouldn't mind a dissenting opinion if it was ignorant and inarticulate. They'd poke fun at it and feel so smart for flaming me and my ideas. They'd congratulate themselves for their sophistication and reason.

On the other hand, one must ask why they wouldn't post it. Are they not certain of the superiority of their ideas? It seems to be a little shallow to be shouting for the impeachment of a President but to be unwilling to openly debate the issues. If President Bush is to be proved guilty of crimes beyond a reasonable doubt, then there should be a public examination of the conflicting evidence.

I'd like to know what makes a war against George Bush OK but a war against Saddam Hussein illegal and immoral.
I'd like to know what gives non-citizen that aims to destroy the Constitution the protections of the Constitution.
If war is not the answer then the question is not: "How do you answer escalating hostile ambition?"
If America is so evil, why do you still live here?
Why is George Bush wrong to go to war when Hillary Clinton and John Kerry authorized it.
Why did Sandy Burglar to steal and destroy archived national security documents before the 9/11 committee looked at them?
Why is Richard Armitage not prosecuted after admitting to the crime that Libby and Rove were hounded over for 2 years?
Why is liberty good enough for us but not good enough for Muslims?
Why should we care about Bosnia, Darfur, or Rwanda but not Afghanistan, Iraq, N. Korea or Iran?

If you can explain these thing satisfactorily to a reasonable man he'll join you in your call to impeach the President. But a reasonable man doesn't get rolled by his emotions. He doesn't live in the land of silly pacifist idealism. He knows that there are evil and aggressive forces in the world and he knows that they must be dealt with in firm terms.

I'll tell you why "" won't post my ideas. They are afraid of the bloodshed. They know their ideas will be sent back to them in virtual body bag. Have you ever seen how a liberal will shut up when they are getting their ass kicked in an argument? As their weakling ideas get their weakling asses kicked, they feel their identity and self-importance evaporating. It feels like being attacked and they don't like the violence. They cut and run just as they want to do in Iraq now.

This is a battle. My ideas are champions. My ideas are strong and fast. They are trained and they are fearless. They are ready for any opponent. And the "" cannot afford to have their ideas destroyed on the home turf.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Copyright © 2005 Michael A. Breeden